[F500] My letter to the BOD and Comp Board
Gene Bennett
mlinkesq at impala-ss.com
Sun Feb 1 22:46:11 MST 2004
The subject line says it all.
>
> I have been following the online discussion on the engine situation
> for the Formula 500 class for about a year now. Now I see this
> statement in the March FasTrack under the "Information Only" heading:
>
> F500
> 1. Allow use of the 493 engines and/or
> the RAVE 494. (Breschini, McLeod) The
> consensus of the F500 community is to
> allow the use of the RAVE 494 with
> blocked off RAVE ports and not to allow the
> 493 engine.
>
> I disagree that this is the consensus that I have seen. I'm not sure
> that there is a consensus; there are definitely several points of view
> that are entrenched, depending on with whom you are speaking. Up
> front, I am not (yet) a Formula 500 competitor, I've been autocrossing
> for about 7 years now and feel that it's time I got a race car and
> start road racing. Since I believe in open wheel racing, I looked for
> a class with simple, competitive cars and discovered Formula 500. I
> have also discovered that the people are wonderful competitors who are
> willing to help another team to get a competitive car on the track and
> not worry if the one they helped beats them.
>
> My opinion is that all three Rotax engines, the current 494, the RAVE
> 494, and the 493, should be made legal for full competition as soon as
> possible. The two 494 engines are not current production while the
> 493 is, and Rotax has contractual commitments to produce it for at
> least another 3 or 4 years. Along with this approval, parts lists
> should be made part of the class specifications so no one can mix &
> match some franken-engine that will have an unfair advantage.
>
> The other engine rule change I suggest is that the class standardize
> on the 38 mm round-slide carburetor for all engines in both Solo and
> Club Racing.
>
> Sincerely,
> Gene Bennett
> Member # 329286
More information about the F500
mailing list